Beyond Compliance: How to Build a Continuous Learning Culture in Early Childhood

AI disclosure notice: the following blogpost was created by a human using Gemini AI’s Deep Research to support the research and organization of the post.

I. Executive Summary: The Imperative for Continuous Quality Improvement in ECE

Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) represents a fundamental shift in the Early Childhood Education (ECE) sector, moving programs beyond minimum licensing compliance toward proactive, data-driven organizational learning. The potential benefits are transformative, yielding richer learning experiences for children, enhanced organizational efficiency, and increased retention and empowerment for staff. CQI fosters a culture where improvement cycles become routine operational practice.

However, the possibility of effectively teaching and sustaining CQI faces immense systemic challenges rooted in the ECE sector's structural vulnerabilities. These challenges include critically high staff turnover, chronic resource constraints that limit access to compensated professional development (PD), and cultural resistance due to the necessity of identifying internal weaknesses. Successfully integrating CQI requires strategic policy reform that links workforce compensation and stability to quality standards, utilizing job-embedded technical assistance and, crucially, establishing structures for reflective supervision to cultivate the necessary psychological safety for learning. The transition from compliance-focused Quality Rating and Improvement Systems (QRIS) to genuine CQI cultures marks the next phase of ECE governance.

II. Foundational Principles of CQI in the ECE Ecosystem

A. Defining Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) in an ECE Context

Continuous Quality Improvement systems establish frameworks for systematic organizational learning aimed at enhancing child and family outcomes. Fundamentally, CQI is a paradigm shift from a reactive mode—fixing problems after they occur—to a proactive, cyclical process of continuous examination. This methodology uses data to define and examine both strengths and problems, followed by continuously testing, improving, and learning from potential solutions.

A robust CQI system contributes directly to consistently improving services, ensuring that resources are used effectively, and guaranteeing that service interventions remain accessible and effective for children and families. This framework is not merely a technical tool but a cultural necessity. It requires an organizational environment where data is continuously collected and used to drive positive change, even when a program appears to be operating successfully, rather than waiting for failure to prompt remediation.

The complexity of implementing CQI successfully suggests that it is not simply a tool to be adopted but a core organizational competency that must be developed. The ability to effectively implement organizational changes presents known difficulties. Therefore, CQI training must address system redesign and strategic planning, making it an adaptive management competency for the organization as a whole. Training curricula designed for ECE leaders must place heavy emphasis on acquiring high-level administrative competencies, developing systems for resource allocation, and establishing organizational belief systems that value critical reflection as opposed to superficial external compliance.

B. Core CQI Methodologies Applicable to ECE

Successful professional development for CQI must introduce specific, actionable models that move abstract improvement goals into tangible daily practice.

One essential tool is the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Cycle. The PDSA cycle is a four-step iterative process used to document and test small, incremental changes. The cycle begins with the Plan step, where educators or teams create a proposal to address an identified area for improvement. They then Do the plan, implementing the change and collecting data and observations. The third step, Study, involves analyzing the data collected, comparing the actual outcomes to initial predictions, and learning from the consequences of the test. Finally, the Act phase determines whether modifications should be made, whether the change should be adopted permanently, or whether the plan should be abandoned, leading to the initiation of the next cycle. This cyclical process is easily relatable for educators as it mirrors the regular process of instructional planning based on assessment results.

Beyond classroom-level application, training must incorporate organizational methodologies, such as the Breakthrough Series Collaborative (BSC). Tested in ECE programs through projects like the Culture of Continuous Learning (CCL) Project, the BSC is a structured method designed to promote sustained practice change by addressing factors at both the individual and organizational level. It is engineered to overcome common barriers to change and utilize leadership across all levels of an organization. Furthermore, Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is a vital component of training, guiding teams to identify the fundamental, systemic causes of issues rather than simply treating surface-level symptoms, thus enabling the deployment of targeted, context-specific improvement strategies.

The ECE environment is highly diverse, encompassing center-based, home-based, Head Start, and private-pay contexts. While PDSA provides a foundational approach, models like BSC or Lean principles, which focus on eliminating waste and improving flow, are crucial for tackling complex, systemic administrative problems such as resource management and workflow inefficiency. If only PDSA is taught, without the organizational support framework provided by models like BSC, CQI can become an isolated, unresourced burden on classroom staff. Therefore, training should be tiered, teaching PDSA for daily practice and integrating BSC and Lean principles for administrative leadership. The fidelity of implementation must be maintained while tailoring the processes to meet the unique logistical constraints and cultural differences of diverse ECE settings.

Table 1: Core CQI Methodologies and Application in ECE

Methodology

Primary Function in CQI Training

Application Example in ECE

Source(s)

Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA)

Iterative cycle for testing small, actionable changes quickly and learning from results.

A teacher uses PDSA to test a new classroom transition routine to improve efficiency and reduce challenging behavior.

Root Cause Analysis (RCA)

Process to identify underlying systemic causes rather than treating surface-level symptoms.

An ECE center uses RCA to determine why their staff satisfaction survey results are consistently low, tracing it back to systemic lack of planning time.

Breakthrough Series Collaborative (BSC)

Structured organizational methodology designed to overcome entrenched barriers and promote sustained change across multiple sites.

A regional Head Start network employs BSC to align organizational policies (e.g., paid planning time) with evidence-based instructional practices.

C. Empirical Links to Quality and Child Outcomes

High-quality ECE programs are defined by warm, responsive educator-child relationships, stimulating and appropriate curricula, and ongoing professional development for staff. CQI directly reinforces these quality features. Research from the United States demonstrates that ECE helps children develop foundational skills in reading, math, self-control, and positive relationships. These benefits are particularly pronounced for vulnerable populations, including children from low-income families, dual language learners, and children with disabilities served in inclusive settings.

The CQI process frequently leverages standardized quality assessment tools to measure and monitor improvement. The Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) is widely used as a CQI mechanism, focusing specifically on the quality of educator–child interactions, which are considered the core element of continuous improvement. By centering improvement efforts on CLASS dimensions, educators ensure children’s social, emotional, and academic growth is supported. Similarly, validation studies of quality systems, which often use tools like the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale (ECERS-R), confirm the link between observed quality metrics and positive child development, providing the necessary data for CQI efforts.

III. The Possibilities: Transformative Benefits of CQI for ECE Educators and Programs

A. Enhancement of Instructional and Relational Quality

CQI provides the necessary framework for programs to systematically and intentionally improve services. By implementing CQI, programs achieve a more consistent implementation of program practices and enhance fidelity to evidence-based practices. This consistency is crucial, as practitioners often struggle to apply new knowledge derived from training to their daily work.

Furthermore, CQI efforts, particularly those focused on interaction quality via tools like CLASS, help educators systematically measure and improve how they engage with children, ensuring richer learning experiences. The relationships forged between teachers, children, and families are recognized as the foundation of quality, and CQI provides a mechanism to uplift and objectively measure this relational core. Moreover, the cyclical nature of CQI allows programs to move away from diffuse training efforts toward strategically selecting professional development initiatives that align directly with specific goals identified in their program improvement plans, such as building cultural competence, addressing mental health, or implementing the Pyramid Model of Positive Behavior Support.

B. Organizational Efficiency, Safety, and Fiscal Stewardship

By applying structured quality management approaches—many of which have roots in industrial methodologies like Lean Six Sigma —CQI significantly enhances operational performance. The benefits include establishing more efficient internal procedures and creating safer environments for children. For leadership, CQI contributes to developing effective program management practices that prioritize valuing personnel and their contributions.

A robust CQI system is integral to effective resource use, preventing resources from being wasted on ineffective interventions. For state leaders, CQI and evaluation are valuable tools for connecting data, decisions, and strategic actions for systems building. Sustained quality improvement also translates into significant market advantages for ECE programs, including satisfied families, reduced turnover (which increases consistency for children), improved word-of-mouth marketing, and ultimately, higher enrollment.

C. Workforce Benefits: Empowerment, Cohesion, and Retention

Perhaps the most significant promise of teaching CQI is its capacity to empower educators, shifting their roles from implementers of external mandates to active participants in system improvement. CQI yields engaged, empowered, and satisfied staff. When service leaders distribute power and grant staff the autonomy to select their focus areas for improvement, staff engagement and investment in program outcomes immediately increase.

This empowerment supports team cohesion and results in lower rates of staff turnover. Policies that address low compensation by providing salary supplements linked to higher quality ratings, which CQI helps programs achieve, demonstrably increase the retention of early care and education staff. A key consideration for sustainable CQI adoption is recognizing that stability within the workforce is critical to ensuring success. CQI relies heavily on sustained data collection and effort. When a stable workforce exists, organizational knowledge is retained, long-term data tracking is feasible, and the necessary trust for critical reflection is established. Without this stability, high turnover rates constantly deplete the investment in training and make truly “continuous” quality improvement impossible. Therefore, viewing CQI training as an intrinsic retention strategy, by valuing staff input and empowering them to improve their daily work environment, creates consistency for children, families, and coworkers.

IV. Systemic Challenges: Barriers to Teaching and Sustaining CQI in the ECE Workforce

The integration of CQI into ECE practice faces formidable obstacles stemming from the sector’s chronic underfunding and structural instability.

A. Workforce Instability and Resource Constraints

The single greatest threat to sustaining any investment in CQI training is the high rate of staff turnover. Turnover among ECE educators, particularly in private-pay centers serving infants and toddlers, can exceed 20% annually, weakening program quality and children's language and social development. When educators depart, the program loses the valuable knowledge and training investment inherent in CQI programs.

The current financing of ECE programs relies on a mixed public/private model that leaves many providers unable to pay a living wage. Even when educators obtain higher degrees and credentials, they frequently lack compensation parity with public school teachers, diminishing the incentive for advanced professional development required for CQI mastery. This creates a severe time and resource deficit: educators lack the time needed for preparation and reflective practice , and training is often mandated outside of work hours, becoming a personal financial burden.

Federal and state investments commit significant resources to quality improvement activities, such as CCDF and Head Start Training and Technical Assistance. However, if the underlying issue of high staff turnover—driven by low wages—is not resolved, these training dollars function as a temporary subsidy to knowledge transfer that walks out the door when staff leave. This renders wide-scale, sustained quality changes elusive. Policy guidance must therefore prioritize structural financial reforms, such as linking higher quality ratings to improved reimbursement or providing tiered salary supplements, as a necessary prerequisite to ensure a stable workforce capable of benefiting from CQI training.

B. Conceptual and Pedagogical Barriers

Teaching CQI requires building specific skills that are often absent in the foundational training of ECE educators. A critical barrier is the deficiency in data literacy. Educators need targeted training and increased motivation to establish habits of mind and cycles of inquiry that support an effective, collaborative data-use culture. Rigorous research validating effective data-utilization interventions specifically in pre-primary settings is still needed to guide this training.

Furthermore, technical CQI tools, such as the implementation of PDSA or Root Cause Analysis, require training in systems thinking that may be foreign to many practitioners. This is compounded by existing dissatisfaction with professional development; many teachers find traditional training activities to be only "somewhat helpful" , generating skepticism toward new training mandates. Additionally, in some cases, educators may have existing knowledge gaps in foundational pedagogical areas (e.g., phonics instruction). If these basic deficits are not addressed, CQI efforts focused on broader system improvement may struggle to yield positive results.

C. Cultural Resistance and the Fear of Failure

CQI demands that programs honestly define and examine their problems. This inherent need to identify shortcomings often creates cultural resistance. Effective CQI requires a safe environment focused purely on learning and improvement. Educators, particularly in fields accustomed to high-stakes evaluation, may fear identifying failures or admitting mistakes. Program leaders must cultivate a culture where staff feel supported and empowered to acknowledge, "we’re not perfect, but we’re getting better".

This resistance is exacerbated by a historic lack of professional agency. Many teachers report having limited influence over their instructional materials or professional development programs. This lack of substantial input undermines the necessary collaborative spirit and shared responsibility that CQI demands for sustainable quality improvement. Overcoming the fear of new methods and the resistance to behavioral change requires deliberate organizational effort and time.

V. Strategic Pathways for Effective CQI Professional Development (PD) Implementation

To successfully teach CQI, professional development must transition from compliance-based activities to sustained, integrated, job-embedded support.

A. Designing Job-Embedded and Collaborative PD

To ensure that CQI training translates into lasting changes in practice, it must be integrated into the educator’s daily work environment. The field is recognizing the necessity of shifting away from externally-delivered professional development toward "internally-driven, program and job-embedded, collaborative, continuous professional learning".

A cornerstone of this strategy is the use of Technical Assistance (TA) and coaching. TA is defined as an individualized approach designed to provide implementation support and build capacity for CQI. Coaching, in particular, has been strongly correlated with improved teaching practices, as reported by center directors. Furthermore, coaches themselves benefit significantly from collaborative networks for sharing resources and strategies. Critically, PD must be built into compensated work schedules, providing opportunities for educators to access dedicated planning time, collaborate with peers, and reflect on their practices. Funding these structures signals that the organization values staff growth and contributes significantly to strengthening retention.

B. Cultivating a Culture of Psychological Safety and Reflective Supervision

Since technical CQI tools (like PDSA and RCA) require objective analysis of performance data , they cannot function effectively in an atmosphere of stress or judgment. If staff feel overwhelmed or unsupported, they will resist genuine data analysis and organizational vulnerability.

Reflective Supervision (RS) is essential for providing the affective infrastructure necessary for objective analysis. RS involves a structured process where supervisors support staff in exploring and understanding the feelings, reactions, and experiences related to their work. This process, built on the building blocks of reflection, collaboration, and regularity , creates an empathetic, nonjudgmental “safe place” for the supervisee to manage the complex emotions and stress inherent in ECE work. This relational support models the very kind of relationship educators are expected to provide children and families, allowing the cognitive work of CQI to proceed without triggering defensive emotional responses. Sustained quality improvement also requires leadership at all levels and a shared sense of responsibility. Service leaders must ensure that the program philosophy, which should be informed by research, serves as the foundation for all critical reflection and improvement efforts.

C. Core Instructional Modules for CQI Capacity Building

Training curricula must be rigorous and targeted to address critical areas of improvement.

Effective programs should focus on data-driven decision making, training staff to use a five-part cycle of inquiry to diagnose problems of practice and develop initial strategic plans. This involves developing skills in utilizing various types of program data—including demographics, PD focus, funding, and workforce characteristics—to understand population needs and target resources effectively. Furthermore, CQI professional development must encompass priority content areas deemed critical to service quality, such as understanding "adverse childhood experiences," integrating concepts related to the "social determinants of health," and providing "culturally safe care". Incorporating principles from quality management, such as Lean adaptations and Kaizen event planning, can help organizations streamline operations, eliminate waste, and boost efficiency, ensuring that complex organizational improvement principles are taught in actionable, manageable ways.

Provides individualized, implementation support that is aligned with daily practice, overcoming the challenge of applying abstract knowledge.

Lack of time and resources for effective, high-quality PD; difficulty applying new knowledge.

Reflective Supervision (RS)

Creates a "safe place" for staff to manage stress and process complex emotions, enabling authentic critical reflection and non-defensive data use.

Fear of failure and cultural resistance; high emotional labor and stress leading to turnover

Focus on Data Literacy & RCA

Builds capability in using data for decision-making and performing systematic problem diagnosis, ensuring resources target root causes.

Conceptual gaps in data literacy; addressing symptoms rather than underlying causes

Financial Support/Stipends

Incentivizes participation and signals that the organization values staff growth; reduces the financial burden of professional compliance/learning.

High staff turnover rates; low satisfaction with unpaid/unsupported PD

VI. Policy Frameworks: Aligning Systems for Sustainable CQI Adoption

The success of teaching ECE educators CQI hinges upon establishing policy frameworks that support organizational change rather than merely mandating compliance.

A. Transitioning from Traditional QRIS to Culture-Focused CQI Systems

For years, Quality Rating and Improvement Systems (QRIS) have been the dominant structure for assessing, improving, and communicating ECE quality. While QRIS has successfully engaged programs and provided financial incentives , a key challenge is that its focus on achieving a specific rating level can foster superficial compliance rather than deep, sustained practice change.

Policy leaders are recognizing the need for systemic redesign. For instance, Massachusetts has paused its QRIS to focus on developing a continuous quality improvement system. This transition reflects the understanding that while QRIS is excellent for accountability, CQI—which focuses on system optimization and organizational learning —is the more effective mechanism for long-term quality improvement. QRIS still serves an essential role by providing the foundation of standards and support mechanisms (training, TA, incentives) necessary for CQI to operate. However, the policy trend suggests a move toward embedding CQI methodologies (like PDSA cycles) directly into quality standards, requiring programs to demonstrate how they engage in improvement processes, thus shifting resources toward ongoing infrastructure development such as coaching and compensated planning time.

B. Addressing Financial Disincentives

To protect the investment made in CQI training, structural financial barriers must be eliminated. Policies must ensure that public funding provides ECE staff with compensation parity, or at least generous tiered salary supplements tied to credentials, to stabilize the workforce and reward educational attainment.

Furthermore, states must ensure that approved providers and organizations are sufficiently resourced to provide access to professional learning opportunities and build the cost of training, compensation, and dedicated planning time into program schedules. Finally, systemic barriers that currently reinforce the notion that ECE should be delivered by small, independent, resource-constrained businesses must be reviewed and potentially eliminated. Supporting shared services frameworks allows small centers to pool administrative and PD resources, making robust CQI infrastructure financially feasible.

C. Recommendations for State and Federal Leadership in CQI Infrastructure

State leaders play a crucial role in providing the guidance and infrastructure necessary for CQI sustainability. Leaders must use CQI and evaluation as tools to build connections between data, decisions, and actions. This includes mandating that approved providers lead, support, and resource quality improvement, specifically by providing the required time and positive work environment for professional practice sharing and decision-making.

Interagency collaboration is necessary for large-scale systemic improvement. Since CQI approaches vary across different child welfare and early learning sectors, sharing knowledge and resources across agencies and community partners is valuable for developing shared learning and effective strategies. Finally, policies must prioritize the comprehensive collection and analysis of data on the ECE workforce, including demographics, training content, and funding sources, to accurately understand workforce characteristics and target CQI investments where they will yield the greatest outcomes for children.

VII. Conclusion: Roadmap for Cultivating a Continuous Learning Culture

Teaching Continuous Quality Improvement to early childhood educators presents an unparalleled opportunity to professionalize the sector, standardize high-quality interactions, and empower staff. CQI offers programs a proven, data-driven methodology for organizational stability, efficiency, and demonstrable child outcomes, leveraging tools like PDSA, RCA, and the CLASS assessment system.

However, the effective diffusion and long-term sustainability of CQI training are critically dependent on policy solutions that address the inherent instability of the ECE workforce. Policy makers must view structural financial reform—specifically linking compensation to quality standards and education attainment—as the primary retention strategy, without which, investments in PD and training are inevitably eroded by high turnover.

The roadmap for cultivating a continuous learning culture requires a dual focus: technical rigor and relational support. Technical expertise must be built through job-embedded coaching, targeted data literacy training, and instruction in systems thinking. Concurrently, relational support must be cultivated through mandated reflective supervision, establishing the psychological safety required for staff to engage in vulnerable critical reflection without fear of blame. Only when ECE educators are compensated fairly, given dedicated time for reflection, and equipped with the technical skills to analyze their practice can CQI become the routine, sustained mechanism for enhancing quality across the sector.

Works cited

1. Benefits of Continuous Quality Improvement | CCEI, https://www.cceionline.com/january-2019-newsletter-continuous-quality-improvement-benefits-of-continuous-quality-improvement/ 2. Case Study: Improving Early Education Quality Through Leadership Support, https://www.startearly.org/resource/case-study-improving-early-education-quality-through-leadership-support/ 3. Staff Turnover in the Early Childhood Workforce infographic - Institute of Education Sciences, https://ies.ed.gov/rel-northeast-islands/2025/01/infographic-1 4. 7 Common Challenges in Early Childhood Education (ECE) - ISHCMC, https://www.ishcmc.com/news-and-blog/challenges-in-early-childhood-education/ 5. Barriers and facilitators to continuous quality improvement engagement among rural physicians in British Columbia, Canada: a mixed-methods study, https://www.rrh.org.au/journal/article/9144/ 6. By Addressing Early Childhood Educator Retention Challenges, Outcomes for Children Are Also Improved - First Five Years Fund, https://www.ffyf.org/resources/2021/07/by-addressing-early-childhood-educator-retention-challenges-outcomes-for-children-are-also-improved/ 7. Three Building Blocks of Reflective Supervision for Early Childhood Professionals, https://www.zerotothree.org/resource/three-building-blocks-of-reflective-supervision/ 8. Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) | Child Welfare Information Gateway, https://www.childwelfare.gov/topics/data-systems-and-organizational-improvement/continuous-quality-improvement-cqi/ 9. CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT: - Education and Early Childhood Development, https://www.ednet.ns.ca/earlyyears/documents/quality_matters_continuous_quality_improvement_en.pdf 10. Continuous Quality Improvement Plan for Children's Programs - Kids Thrive Collaborative, https://kidsthrive.wv.gov/Documents/December%202023%20Update_CQI_Plan_FINAL.pdf 11. 2019 Early Childhood Systems Building Resource Guide: Program Evaluation and Continuous Quality Improvement - Child Care Technical Assistance Network, https://childcareta.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/earlychildhoodsystem_buildingresourceguides_chapter8.pdf 12. QUALITY AT SCALE: Supporting Sustainable, High-Quality Early Care and Education Across the Commonwealth - Build Initiative, https://buildinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Quality-at-Scale.pdf 13. Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Worksheet - Institute for Healthcare Improvement, https://www.ihi.org/library/tools/plan-do-study-act-pdsa-worksheet 14. Using PDSA Cycles to Boost Learning Outcomes | Edutopia, https://www.edutopia.org/article/using-pdsa-cycles-boost-learning-outcomes/ 15. After Your Plan is Approved - Connecticut Office of Early Childhood, https://www.ctoec.org/elevate/create-program-plan/approved/ 16. Promoting a Culture of Continuous Learning in Early Care and Education Settings - The Administration for Children and Families, https://acf.gov/sites/default/files/documents/opre/ccl-report-summary-508_qc.pdf 17. The Culture of Continuous Learning Project: A Breakthrough Series Collaborative for Improving Child Care and Head Start Quality - The Administration for Children and Families, https://acf.gov/sites/default/files/documents/opre/ccl_theory_of_change_brief.pdf 18. Root Cause Analysis Workbook - American Institutes for Research, https://www.air.org/sites/default/files/2024-06/Module1-Workbook3-RootCauseAnalysisWorkbook.pdf 19. A Systematic Review of Approaches for Continuous Quality Improvement Capacity-Building - PMC - NIH, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8781219/ 20. Online Lean Continuous Improvement Certificate | Emory University, https://ece.emory.edu/areas-of-study/lean-six-sigma/continuous-improvement/certificate.php 21. Examining the tensions between cultural models of care in family childcare and quality rating improvement systems - SDSU College of Education - San Diego State University, https://education2.sdsu.edu/ceed/steps/fcc-culturalmodels.pdf 22. Children's Learning and Development Benefits from High-Quality Early Care and Education: A Summary of the Evidence, https://acf.gov/sites/default/files/documents/opre/%232023-226%20Benefits%20from%20ECE%20Highlight%20508.pdf 23. Complete Guide To CLASS® - Teachstone, https://teachstone.com/class/ 24. ECE Quality Improvement through CLASS Assessment - First 5 Humboldt, https://www.first5humboldt.org/ece-quality-improvement-through-class-assessment/ 25. Validation of Quality Rating and Improvement Systems (QRIS): Examples from Four States - The Administration for Children and Families, https://acf.gov/sites/default/files/documents/opre/qris_brief_validation_in_4_states.pdf 26. Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) - The Pennsylvania Key, https://www.pakeys.org/workforce/cqi/ 27. PRACTICAL IDEAS TO SUPPORT CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT - Acecqa, https://www.acecqa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-05/Practical-ideas-to-support-quality-improvement_0.pdf 28. 8 Proven Strategies To Increase Child Care Staff Retention - ChildCare Education Institute, https://www.cceionline.com/reduce-staff-turnover-childcare/ 29. QRIS Quality Standards Web Sites - Child Care Technical Assistance Network, https://childcareta.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/437_1504_qris_standards_websites.pdf 30. Full article: Improving Data-Based Decision-Making in Early Childhood Services: A Systematic Review Informed by the Capability Opportunity and Motivation Model of Behavior - Taylor & Francis Online, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0145935X.2025.2468185 31. Using Data to Improve Quality in Early Education Settings, https://www.gse.harvard.edu/professional-education/program/using-data-improve-quality-early-education-settings 32. Section 4: Ways To Approach the Quality Improvement Process (Page 1 of 2) - AHRQ, https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/quality-improvement/improvement-guide/4-approach-qi-process/index.html 33. Root Cause Analysis in Comprehensive Support and Improvement Schools - Maryland State Department of Education, https://www.marylandpublicschools.org/stateboard/Documents/09242019/TabJ-RootCauseAnalysisComprehensiveSupportImprovementSchools.pdf 34. A scoping review of the evaluation and effectiveness of technical assistance - PMC, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9238031/ 35. Supports for Early Care and Education Coaches Working with Preschool Teachers and Family Child Care Providers, https://acf.gov/sites/default/files/documents/opre/opre_support_for_early_care_2022.pdf 36. Promoting High-Quality Early Education and Care - Mass.gov, https://www.mass.gov/info-details/promoting-high-quality-early-education-and-care 37. Reflective Supervision | HeadStart.gov, https://headstart.gov/browse/tag/reflective-supervision